The Breakeven Question Has a Number, Not a Vibe
“Should we set up an entity or keep using an EOR?” is the most common question companies ask after their first year of international hiring. The answer is a math problem, not a philosophical debate. Every country has a calculable point where the cumulative cost of EOR fees exceeds the setup and maintenance cost of a local entity. Below that headcount, EOR wins. Above it, the entity pays for itself.
Most teams use this kind of insight best when it sits beside practical comparison data, decision frameworks, and market demand signals.
The formula is straightforward. Applying it honestly — with real numbers, not the optimistic estimates entity formation companies sell — is where most companies go wrong.
The Formula
Annual EOR cost = (Monthly EOR fee × 12) × Number of employees
Annual entity cost = Entity setup cost (amortized over 3 years) + Annual entity maintenance + Local payroll provider + Accounting and compliance + Registered agent/office
Breakeven headcount = Annual entity cost ÷ (Annual EOR fee per employee)
The breakeven headcount tells you: at this many employees, the entity costs the same as EOR. Above it, the entity saves money every year.
Two caveats before we run the numbers. First, entity costs are partially fixed (registration, office, accounting) and partially variable (payroll processing scales with headcount). The formula above simplifies by using averages, but the reality is that your marginal cost per employee drops as headcount rises on an entity. Second, EOR fees are negotiable — the published $599/month drops to $400–$475 at scale. Use your actual or expected negotiated rate, not list price.
Country-by-Country Breakeven Analysis
United States
| Cost component | EOR | Own entity |
|---|---|---|
| Entity setup | — | $2,000–$5,000 (state-dependent; Delaware LLC or C-Corp) |
| Registered agent | — | $300–$500/year |
| State compliance (annual reports, franchise tax) | — | $500–$2,000/year |
| Payroll provider (Gusto, ADP, etc.) | — | $40–$80/employee/month |
| Accounting | — | $500–$1,500/month |
| Workers’ comp insurance | Included | $500–$2,000/year |
| EOR fee | $500–$599/month per employee | — |
Annual EOR cost at 10 employees: $60,000–$71,880 Annual entity cost at 10 employees: $2,000 (setup, amortized) + $400 (agent) + $1,000 (state) + $7,200 (payroll at $60/mo × 10) + $12,000 (accounting) + $1,000 (workers’ comp) = ~$23,600
Breakeven: 4–5 employees. The US is the cheapest country to set up and maintain an entity, which means the EOR breakeven comes earlier than anywhere else. For US-based companies hiring domestically, the question isn’t EOR vs. entity — it’s which state to incorporate in. EOR in the US only makes sense for foreign companies without a US presence, and even then, the breakeven is fast.
United Kingdom
| Cost component | EOR | Own entity |
|---|---|---|
| Entity setup (Ltd) | — | $500–$2,000 |
| Registered office | — | $500–$1,500/year |
| HMRC PAYE registration | — | Free |
| Payroll provider | — | £50–£100/employee/month |
| Accounting & annual filings | — | £5,000–£15,000/year |
| Auto-enrollment pension admin | — | £500–£1,500/year |
| EOR fee | $500–$599/month per employee | — |
Annual EOR cost at 10 employees: $60,000–$71,880 Annual entity cost at 10 employees: $1,500 (setup, amortized) + $1,000 (office) + $9,000 (payroll at £75/mo) + $10,000 (accounting) + $1,000 (pension admin) = ~$22,500
Breakeven: 4–5 employees. The UK is similarly efficient to the US for entity setup. A Ltd company can be registered in 24 hours. The ongoing costs are manageable, and the payroll/accounting infrastructure is mature and competitive. EOR in the UK primarily serves companies that want to avoid any administrative burden or that have only 1–3 UK employees.
Germany
| Cost component | EOR | Own entity |
|---|---|---|
| Entity setup (GmbH) | — | €15,000–€30,000 (including €25,000 minimum share capital) |
| Notary and registration | — | €2,000–€5,000 |
| Registered office / virtual office | — | €2,000–€5,000/year |
| Payroll provider (DATEV-based) | — | €50–€120/employee/month |
| Tax advisor (Steuerberater) | — | €8,000–€20,000/year |
| Works council compliance (if applicable) | — | Variable |
| EOR fee | $500–$599/month per employee | — |
Annual EOR cost at 10 employees: $60,000–$71,880 Annual entity cost at 10 employees: $10,000 (setup, amortized over 3 years) + $3,500 (office) + $10,200 (payroll at €85/mo) + $14,000 (Steuerberater) = ~$37,700
Breakeven: 7–8 employees. Germany’s higher entity setup costs (the GmbH requires €25,000 in share capital, though it can be used operationally) and more expensive ongoing compliance push the breakeven higher. The Steuerberater (tax advisor) is practically mandatory — German tax compliance is complex enough that most foreign companies can’t manage it internally. A UG (mini-GmbH with €1 minimum share capital) reduces setup costs but carries less credibility with German authorities and business partners.
Singapore
| Cost component | EOR | Own entity |
|---|---|---|
| Entity setup (Pte Ltd) | — | SGD 3,000–$8,000 |
| Corporate secretary (mandatory) | — | SGD 1,500–$3,000/year |
| Registered office | — | SGD 2,000–$5,000/year |
| Payroll provider | — | SGD 50–$100/employee/month |
| Accounting & IRAS filings | — | SGD 5,000–$12,000/year |
| Employment Pass admin (if needed) | — | SGD 500–$2,000/application |
| EOR fee | $500–$599/month per employee | — |
Annual EOR cost at 10 employees: $60,000–$71,880 Annual entity cost at 10 employees: $2,500 (setup, amortized) + $2,250 (secretary) + $3,500 (office) + $9,000 (payroll at SGD 75/mo) + $8,500 (accounting) = ~$25,750
Breakeven: 5–6 employees. Singapore is business-friendly by design. The Pte Ltd structure is straightforward, registration takes 1–2 days, and the regulatory environment is transparent. The main hidden cost is CPF administration — at 17% employer contribution, CPF is a significant payroll expense, but it applies whether you use EOR or an entity. The cost difference at breakeven is purely the EOR fee vs. entity maintenance.
India
| Cost component | EOR | Own entity |
|---|---|---|
| Entity setup (Pvt Ltd) | — | $5,000–$15,000 |
| Registered office | — | $2,000–$5,000/year |
| Payroll provider | — | $20–$50/employee/month |
| Compliance (PF, ESI, PT, TDS filings) | — | $3,000–$8,000/year |
| Accounting & audit (mandatory) | — | $5,000–$15,000/year |
| Company secretary (mandatory over threshold) | — | $2,000–$4,000/year |
| EOR fee | $400–$599/month per employee | — |
Annual EOR cost at 10 employees (at $500/mo avg): $60,000 Annual entity cost at 10 employees: $3,500 (setup, amortized) + $3,500 (office) + $4,200 (payroll at $35/mo) + $5,500 (compliance) + $10,000 (accounting) + $3,000 (CS) = ~$29,700
Breakeven: 6–7 employees. India’s entity costs are moderate, but the compliance burden is heavy. Monthly PF (Provident Fund), ESI (Employees’ State Insurance), and Professional Tax filings require dedicated attention. Annual statutory audit is mandatory for all Pvt Ltd companies. Most foreign companies outsource these to a local compliance firm, which works but adds to the fixed cost base. EOR makes particular sense in India for companies with fewer than 5 employees because the compliance overhead doesn’t scale down — you pay roughly the same in accounting and compliance for 2 employees as for 10.
Brazil
| Cost component | EOR | Own entity |
|---|---|---|
| Entity setup (LTDA) | — | $15,000–$40,000 |
| Registered office | — | $3,000–$8,000/year |
| Payroll provider (eSocial-compliant) | — | $50–$150/employee/month |
| Accounting (Contabilidade) | — | $10,000–$25,000/year |
| Labor compliance (CLT, FGTS, INSS filings) | — | $5,000–$12,000/year |
| Annual legal review | — | $3,000–$8,000/year |
| EOR fee | $500–$599/month per employee | — |
Annual EOR cost at 10 employees: $60,000–$71,880 Annual entity cost at 10 employees: $10,000 (setup, amortized) + $5,500 (office) + $12,000 (payroll at $100/mo) + $17,500 (accounting) + $8,500 (labor compliance) + $5,500 (legal) = ~$59,000
Breakeven: 10–12 employees. Brazil has the highest entity maintenance costs of any major market. The eSocial system (Brazil’s unified digital bookkeeping for labor, tax, and social security obligations) requires precise, real-time reporting. The CLT imposes extensive obligations around 13th salary, vacation bonuses, FGTS deposits, and meal/transport vouchers that must be calculated and reported monthly. Accounting costs are 2–3x what they are in the US or UK because the regulatory complexity demands specialized, local expertise.
Brazil is the country where EOR makes the strongest financial case at scale. Even companies with 15–20 employees in Brazil sometimes maintain their EOR relationship because the operational burden of running a compliant entity exceeds the fee savings. Best EOR for Brazil covers which providers handle Brazil’s complexity best.
Summary: Breakeven by Country
| Country | Entity setup cost | Annual maintenance | Breakeven headcount |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | $2,000–$5,000 | $20,000–$25,000 | 4–5 employees |
| United Kingdom | $500–$2,000 | $20,000–$25,000 | 4–5 employees |
| Singapore | $3,000–$8,000 | $22,000–$28,000 | 5–6 employees |
| India | $5,000–$15,000 | $25,000–$32,000 | 6–7 employees |
| Germany | $15,000–$30,000 | $30,000–$40,000 | 7–8 employees |
| Brazil | $15,000–$40,000 | $45,000–$60,000 | 10–12 employees |
Costs This Calculator Doesn’t Capture
The financial breakeven is real but incomplete. Three costs don’t show up in the formula:
Management time. Running a local entity requires someone’s attention — payroll approvals, compliance questions, local authority correspondence, annual filings. If your head of People spends 5 hours/month managing a German GmbH, that’s 60 hours/year of senior staff time. An EOR eliminates this.
Risk exposure. When you operate your own entity, you own the compliance liability. Payroll errors, misclassified deductions, late filings — the fines land on your entity. An EOR absorbs this liability (that’s the core value proposition). The financial value of transferred risk is hard to quantify but real, especially in complex markets like Brazil, Germany, and France.
Opportunity cost. The 8–16 weeks spent setting up an entity in Germany or Brazil is time your team isn’t spending on revenue-generating activities. For startups, this time cost can be more significant than the dollar cost.
These factors don’t change the breakeven headcount, but they change when it makes sense to act on it. A company that hits the breakeven at 8 employees in Germany might reasonably stay on EOR until 12–15 employees because the management time, risk transfer, and opportunity cost of entity setup outweigh the fee savings.
The math tells you when the entity becomes cheaper. Your capacity, risk tolerance, and strategic commitment to the market tell you when to pull the trigger. For the full framework on making this decision, see our EOR vs. entity setup guide.
To move from strategy to execution, use remote jobs by country and benchmark provider options in EOR comparisons.
Further Reading
- EOR vs. Entity Setup — Strategic framework for the EOR-to-entity decision
- EOR Exit Strategy — How to plan and execute the transition from EOR to your own entity
- Best EOR for Brazil — Providers that handle Brazil’s complex compliance environment
- Best EOR for Germany — GmbH setup assistance and German labor law expertise
- Read Deel review
Was this page helpful?
Tell us or send a correction.