A local employment contract is written to comply with the labor laws of the country where the employee works. It’s not your standard US offer letter translated into another language. It must include terms that local law mandates, and it cannot include terms that local law prohibits. Using a generic global template is one of the fastest ways to create unenforceable agreements — or contracts that default to terms far more generous to the employee than you intended.
Germany requires contracts to specify working hours, vacation entitlement (minimum 20 days for a 5-day week), notice periods, and applicable collective bargaining agreements. France mandates a trial period clause with specific maximum durations — 4 months for cadre employees, 2 months for non-cadre — and the trial period must be explicitly stated or it doesn’t exist. Brazil’s CLT requires explicit mention of the employee’s job classification, salary, and working hours, and any omission triggers default rules that favor the employee. Japan requires written conditions covering 15 specific items, including work location, duties, and retirement age. In the Netherlands, failing to specify the contract end date in a fixed-term agreement converts it to a permanent contract automatically.
What’s prohibited matters as much as what’s required. Non-compete agreements that are standard in US contracts are void in India and unenforceable in California. At-will termination clauses have no legal meaning in most European jurisdictions. Non-solicitation clauses require compensation payments to be enforceable in France and Germany. Including these terms in a local contract isn’t just useless — it can signal to a labor court that the employer didn’t understand local law, which weakens your position in any dispute.
Language requirements add another layer. France requires employment contracts to be in French. Quebec mandates French as well. Brazil requires Portuguese. Some countries accept bilingual contracts, but in case of conflict, the local-language version prevails. The ILO’s Employment Relationship Recommendation (R198) provides guiding principles on what constitutes an employment relationship and the protections that should follow.
Why It Matters for EOR
EOR providers draft local employment contracts as their core service. A compliant contract in Indonesia or Poland requires knowledge of local labor codes that most companies don’t have in-house. The EOR’s legal team handles drafting and ensures each contract reflects current law — legislation changes, and contracts need to keep pace.
Still, review what your employee is signing. Pay attention to three things: notice periods (90 days is standard in some countries, and that applies to both sides), probation period length (your window to exit cheaply), and any clauses around mandatory benefits that exceed statutory minimums. Some EOR providers include above-market benefits in their standard contracts to improve employee experience. That’s fine — until you’re paying for benefits you didn’t agree to.
Contract quality varies between providers. Deel and Oyster both use template-based systems customized per jurisdiction. Ask to see a sample contract for your target country before signing with any provider. If they won’t share one, that tells you something about transparency.
For practical use of this concept, see EOR vs PEO explained and remote jobs by country.
Further Reading
- Hiring in France: contract requirements and mandatory clauses — France has some of the most prescriptive contract requirements in the world, including mandatory trial period terms.
- Hiring in Germany: employment contract rules and notice periods — German contracts must specify working hours, vacation, notice periods, and applicable collective bargaining agreements.
- EOR comparisons
- Read Deel review
- EOR vs PEO explained
Was this page helpful?
Tell us or send a correction.