Pave is the best compensation management tool for most global teams in 2026. Its real-time benchmarking data, equity compensation modeling, and total comp statements give you what you actually need: defensible pay decisions across markets. Figures wins for European-focused teams. Deel is the right pick if you want comp data baked into the same platform that manages your EOR employees. If you are comparing EOR-native data models first, read our Deel review, our Remote review, and our Rippling review before finalizing your comp stack. Here’s the breakdown.
Summary
Pave leads on benchmarking depth and total compensation visibility, especially for tech companies with equity-heavy packages. Figures is the strongest choice for European pay benchmarking with GDPR-native data practices. Deel earns third for teams that want compensation insights directly inside their EOR workflow without toggling between platforms.
What to Look For
Real-time benchmarking data, not annual surveys. Traditional comp surveys are 6–12 months stale by the time you use them. For global teams competing for talent across markets, you need data that reflects what companies are paying right now, not what they paid last year.
In practice, teams apply this guidance faster when they pair it with best EOR providers, remote roles in this market, and the Employer of Record glossary.
Multi-currency and multi-market support. A tool that benchmarks San Francisco salaries is useless for your Lisbon team. You need market-specific data across the countries where you hire, with currency conversion that reflects purchasing power — not just exchange rates.
Pay equity analytics. Regulators in the EU, UK, and several US states now require pay gap reporting. Your comp tool should surface gender and demographic pay gaps before your legal team gets a compliance notice.
EOR cost layering. When you hire through an EOR, your total cost per employee includes the EOR fee, employer taxes, statutory benefits, and the salary itself. A comp tool that only benchmarks base salary misses 20–40% of your actual cost in many countries. Use our EOR payroll guide and EOR compliance guide as a checklist when you model all-in compensation.
Top Picks
1. Pave — Best Overall for Global Tech Teams
Pave connects directly to your HRIS and payroll systems to pull real-time compensation data. Instead of relying on self-reported survey data, Pave aggregates actual pay data from thousands of companies, giving you benchmarks that reflect current market reality.
Pricing: Free tier available for basic benchmarking. Paid plans for advanced analytics, comp planning, and total rewards statements are custom-priced.
EOR integration: Pave integrates with major HRIS platforms (Rippling, BambooHR, Workday) and can ingest data from EOR platforms. The integration isn’t native to Deel or Remote specifically, but comp data from EOR-employed staff can flow in through HRIS connectors or CSV uploads.
Strongest feature: Total compensation statements that include salary, equity, and benefits in a single employee-facing view. For distributed teams where equity is part of the package, this is essential for retention.
Where it falls short: Benchmarking data skews toward US tech companies. European and APAC data is growing but less dense. If most of your team is in emerging markets, the benchmarks may be thin.
2. Figures — Best for European Compensation Data
Figures is built for European compensation benchmarking. Its dataset covers salaries, benefits, and equity across EU markets with GDPR-compliant data practices from the ground up. If you’re hiring heavily in France, Germany, the Netherlands, or Spain, Figures gives you the most reliable local benchmarks.
Pricing: Custom pricing based on company size and modules. Expect to talk to sales.
EOR integration: No native EOR integration. Figures connects to HRIS platforms and ingests payroll data through integrations. You’d sync EOR employee data through your central HRIS or manually upload comp data.
Strongest feature: European pay equity analytics that align with the EU Pay Transparency Directive requirements. If you need to comply with the directive by 2026, Figures gives you the reporting framework now.
Where it falls short: Limited US and APAC benchmarking data. If your team is split evenly between Europe and the US, you may need Figures plus another tool.
3. Ravio — Best for Startup Compensation Benchmarking
Ravio focuses on compensation benchmarking for European startups and scale-ups. The platform pulls real-time data from venture-backed companies, giving you benchmarks that actually reflect what funded startups are paying — not what enterprise companies pay.
Pricing: Free tier for basic benchmarking. Paid tiers for deeper analytics and comp planning are custom-priced.
EOR integration: Minimal. Ravio connects to HRIS platforms but has no direct EOR integrations. Data from EOR-employed staff needs to flow through your HRIS first.
Where it falls short: Narrow dataset — primarily European startups. If you’re a mature company or hiring outside Europe, the benchmarks won’t be representative.
4. Carta Total Comp — Best for Equity-Heavy Packages
Carta already manages your cap table. Total Comp extends that into compensation planning, letting you model offers and comp reviews with equity and cash together. For companies where stock options are a significant part of the package, having comp planning inside Carta eliminates the guesswork.
Pricing: Bundled with Carta’s equity management platform. Pricing varies by company stage and cap table complexity.
EOR integration: No direct EOR integration. Equity data lives in Carta; salary data comes from your HRIS or payroll. EOR-employed staff’s cash compensation needs manual or HRIS-mediated import.
Where it falls short: Compensation benchmarking data is secondary to the equity focus. If you need rich salary benchmarking across markets, pair Carta with Pave or Figures.
5. Lattice Compensation — Best for Performance-Tied Comp
Lattice connects compensation planning to performance reviews, OKRs, and engagement data. If you tie raises and bonuses to performance cycles, Lattice keeps it all in one system. Managers see performance data alongside comp recommendations during review cycles.
Pricing: Compensation module is add-on to Lattice’s core platform. Core starts around $11/person/month; compensation planning is additional.
EOR integration: Lattice integrates with HRIS platforms and can pull data from EOR systems via connectors. The integration quality depends on your HRIS middleware.
Where it falls short: Benchmarking data isn’t Lattice’s strength. You’ll likely need Pave or Figures alongside it for market data, using Lattice for the planning and approval workflows.
6. Deel — Best for EOR-Integrated Comp Insights
Deel’s compensation tools live inside its EOR platform. You get cost-of-living comparisons, salary insights by market, and total cost calculations that include EOR fees, employer taxes, and statutory benefits. For teams primarily hiring through Deel, this is the most contextually relevant comp data available.
Pricing: Included with Deel’s EOR and HR platform. No separate comp tool fee.
EOR integration: Native. Total cost visibility — salary, EOR fees, employer contributions, benefits — in one view. This is the only tool on this list that factors EOR cost into the compensation picture automatically.
Where it falls short: Not a full compensation management suite. No performance-linked comp planning, no equity modeling, limited benchmarking depth compared to Pave or Figures.
Comparison Table
| Tool | Best For | Benchmarking Data | Pay Equity Analytics | EOR Integration | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pave | Global tech teams | Real-time, US-heavy | Yes | Via HRIS connectors | Free tier; paid custom |
| Figures | European teams | Real-time, EU-focused | Strong (EU directive-aligned) | Via HRIS | Custom |
| Ravio | European startups | Real-time, VC-backed companies | Basic | Via HRIS | Free tier; paid custom |
| Carta Total Comp | Equity-heavy packages | Limited | Basic | Via HRIS | Bundled with Carta |
| Lattice | Performance-tied comp | Limited | Yes | Via HRIS connectors | From $11/person/month + add-on |
| Deel | EOR-first teams | Market-level | Basic | Native | Included with EOR |
How These Tools Work with EOR Providers
Compensation management for EOR-employed teams has a structural gap most tools don’t address: the total cost of an EOR employee isn’t just salary. It’s salary plus employer taxes (which vary wildly — 14% in the UK, 30%+ in France, 40%+ in Brazil), plus statutory benefits, plus the EOR’s management fee.
Deel is the only tool here that shows this full cost picture natively. Every other tool benchmarks base salary and maybe total cash, but doesn’t factor in country-specific employer costs or EOR fees. If you’re using Pave to benchmark a role in Germany, you still need to add the EOR layer yourself.
The practical workflow for most teams: use Pave or Figures for market benchmarking and pay equity, then model total cost in your EOR’s platform before extending an offer. Two systems, but each does its part well. Trying to do everything inside one tool means compromising on either benchmarking depth or cost accuracy. If you’re building this process from scratch, pair this with our guides on best global payroll software and what global payroll actually includes.
To connect this guidance with live hiring demand, see hiring your first international employee and remote jobs by country.
Further Reading
- Deel Review
- Remote Review
- Rippling Review
- EOR HR Guide
- EOR Payroll Guide
- EOR Compliance Guide
- Best Global Payroll Software
- Best HR Reporting Software for Global Teams
- Compare EOR providers
- Hiring your first international employee
When Not to Use This Approach
Your total headcount is under 50 employees. A well-structured spreadsheet plus a market data subscription (Radford, Levels.fyi, Figures) costs 80% less and requires no implementation. The platform value compounds with volume and multi-country complexity, not with small team size.
You don’t run formal compensation review cycles. Compensation management software assumes a structured annual or semi-annual cycle with manager approvals and calibration sessions. If that process doesn’t exist, you’re paying for tooling that has nothing to automate.
Your international team is all in one or two countries. Point solutions for those specific markets — local benchmarking providers, payroll platforms with built-in comp tools — are usually more accurate on local data than a global platform covering 150 countries.
Your compensation structure is simple flat salary with no bonus or equity. Variable comp, equity grants, and merit band management are where comp platforms earn their keep. If none of that applies, a spreadsheet covers everything and a platform adds overhead without value.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I benchmark salaries for a role that only exists in one country on my team?
Use Pave or Figures to pull market data for that role in that specific country. Don’t benchmark against your home market’s salary — a senior engineer in Portugal shouldn’t be priced against San Francisco rates or vice versa. Most comp tools let you filter by country, city, company stage, and funding status.
Should I pay the same salary regardless of location?
This is a policy decision, not a software question. Location-based pay (adjusting for local market rates) is more common. Equal pay regardless of location sounds fair but creates budget distortions and can make certain markets uncompetitive. Your comp tool should support whichever model you choose — Pave and Lattice both handle location-based and global bands.
Do EOR employees need separate compensation bands?
Not necessarily, but your total cost modeling does. The salary band can be the same, but the all-in cost for an EOR employee in France will be 40–50% above base salary after employer contributions and EOR fees. Make sure whoever approves headcount sees the total cost, not just the salary number.
How does the EU Pay Transparency Directive affect my comp tool choice?
If you have employees in the EU, you’ll need to report pay ranges and pay gaps. Figures is the most aligned with the directive’s requirements today. Pave and Lattice are adding EU compliance features. Choose a tool that can generate the required reports now, not one that promises the feature “soon.”
Further Reading
Was this page helpful?
Tell us or send a correction.